Teacher Ari on Educational Philosophies

Teacher Orhan Seyfi Ari, thinker, reformer educator “Teacher of Teachers”, they named streets after; teacher, head teacher hailed for social & cultural, educational leadership reforms & popularising education, columnist, poet, some of teacher Ari’s educational philosophy on philosophers’ philosophies, thinkers in teaching, are deducible as below ~ thinker teacher Ari saw himself as a humble teacher: “I am neither a scholar, nor a philosopher” – he has been hailed in prose, poetry, as scholar, philosopher.

Do?rusöz in K?br?s -on a nation’s philosophy of education, teachers, teaching and teacher Orhan Ari, 5 Feb. 1999Sometimes a great school is a man, sometimes a man is himself a great schoolFedai in Halk?n Sesi -on teacher philosopher’s philosophy, 27 Dec. 1992 Seeking of you insight the wonders of the universe intoI knew, at last, this, that the universe was you

Metiner in Birlik -poem on social changes in philosophy in culture & deeds of illumination of teacher Ari, 29 Jan. 1993Well known and versed, none was he… Than the pilgrim -the teacher: Orhan Ari… He settled on the throne of omniscience in the world after here

Orhan Seyfi Ari’s educational philosophy on philosophy of education rhymed thus philosophers’ philosophies, teachers’ efforts’, educational philosophies’ failures to teach man his difference from wild animals he behaved as:-

‘I was an ape’ you say, -or amphibian?And now?! Are you not , now, ‘man’!?

Failings in educational philosophy were of educational philosophers, eastern and western thinkers, of philosophy, teachers, in teaching values in philosophies.

Were affecting educational philosophies and educational philosophers, educators and education, teachers and teaching, philosophy and science, knowledge and wisdom, the biases in educational philosophy of those who thrived on ignorance and sought to unpopularize in their philosophies of education each other’s kind to the masses with many concerns or under pain of ridicule or other injury and unable not to believe or accept as told, by, e.g., supporting ‘the monkey trial’ or ‘discovering’ the Piltdown man, by abusing the trust and innocence of man in bigotry or ignorance ~ in teaching, educational philosophy , educational philosophers, educators, teachers too readily adopted viewpoint applications of others into their philosophy and teaching of young minds.

Ethical skepticism in philosophy by some philosophers was a concern of daily life in philosophy of education to educators and teachers in teaching -through philosophies of education, educators’ and teachers’ teaching affected society’s learned behavior ~ whether ontology, philosophy, philosophers could explain or not the transcendental, whether man lacked mental capacity for the transcendental as in some philosophers’ philosophies or not, some educational philosophies’ and educators’ suggestion, that ‘truth’ could be only scientifically known in philosophy, psychology’s increased acceptance of philosophy’s and philosophers’ ‘mind’, cosmology’s agreement with eastern and western philosophy and great philosophers on a ‘mysterious force’, made doubtful; science’s, ontology’s, philosophy’s, great philosophers’ not fully understanding the transcendental did not justify educators’ and teachers’, in educational philosophy, deeming transcendental philosophy untruth in epistemology, education, school teaching; such attitude to transcendental philosophy, in any philosophy of education was disservice to mankind whose expectations from philosophies of education included aspirations global to transcendental philosophy based knowledge.

In educational philosophy also, good considered some eastern and western philosophies and philosophers man, bad other philosophies and philosophers; while differed philosophers’ knowledge and wisdom and philosophy and preferred educational philosophy, logic in philosophy on man’s behavior (irrespective of

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

Tags: , ,

Leave a comment